Search Results for "Statutory purchase"

2755 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2755 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Capital Gains Case — Section 54F Deduction Computation Clarified. Investment in new asset before due date of filing return qualifies for exemption even if return is filed late.

The appellant, Humayun Suleman Merchant, sold a plot of land in Mumbai on 29th April 1995 for Rs.85,33,250/-, resulting in a long-term capital gain. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Writ Petition in Sales Tax Appeal Maintainability Case — Right of Appeal Under Section 55(1)(c) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Includes State Government. The State is a 'person aggrieved' by a Commissioner's determination under Section 52 and can appeal to the Tribunal.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the decision of the Sales Tax Tribunal dated 30 June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...