Search Results for "Premature Prosecution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Premature Prosecution"

329 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Forgery and Cheating Case Due to Premature Termination of Investigation. Inherent Powers Under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Should Not Be Exercised to Stifle Ongoing Investigation When Forensic Reports Are Pending and Allegations Disclose Prima Facie Cognizable Offences Under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from an FIR lodged by the appellant-complainant, the adopted daughter and legal heir of Dr. G.B. Bazliel, against the respondents-ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Union's Challenge to BMRCL Conduct Rules Due to Appropriate Government Dispute. Central and State Governments Argue Jurisdiction Over Metro Rail Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act.

3 Nov 2025

This batch of writ petitions, filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, centered on the determination o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

18 Jun 2025

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

6 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging APMC License Cancellation for Non-Renewal — Licensee Cannot Claim Right to Automatic Renewal Without Compliance with Statutory Conditions. The court held that renewal of license under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is not automatic and APMC has discretion to refuse renewal if conditions are not satisfied.

19 Mar 2024

The petitioners, seven individuals, were licensees of the Mumbai Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Company and Directors in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Lack of CBI Jurisdiction. Registration of FIR Without Involvement of Public Servant and Based on RBI Master Circular Held Without Authority, and Section 120B IPC Cannot Apply Standalone.

30 Sep 2022

The case involved Associate Lumbers Private Limited and its directors, who had availed loan facilities from Corporation Bank (later Union Bank of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Investigation by Wrong Police Station Vitiated Proceedings. Held that police station lacking territorial jurisdiction cannot investigate an offence under Section 304B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and the entire investigation is void ab initio.

22 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Rakesh, Muniveerappa M., Srinivasa M., and others, filed separate criminal petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Closing Evidence in NI Act Case — Failure to Cross-Examine Complainant's Affidavit Does Not Automatically Close Defence Evidence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant's affidavit-in-evidence is fundamental to a fair trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the trial court's order closing evidence without granting such opportunity was premature and set aside.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Shankar Lotlikar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6544 OF 2016

20 Apr 2017

The Criminal Application No. 6544 of 2016 was filed before the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by nine applicants belonging to the Kothale ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Doctor Under PCPNDT Act for Lack of Prima Facie Case — Non-Maintenance of Form F Without Allegation of Sex Determination Does Not Constitute Offence Under Section 5 of PCPNDT Act, 1994.

9 May 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Vijay Shivnath Lahoti, a medical practitioner, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read ...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)