Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

760 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Mar 2019

A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

18 Feb 2025

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

11 Oct 2013

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Removal of Employees Appointed on Compassionate Grounds Without Following Regular Recruitment Process. The Petitioners, Appointed as Hamals and Clerk-Typists Under a State Government Scheme for Dependents of Retiring Class IV Employees, Argued That Their Long Service of 18 Years Entitled Them to Absorption, While Respondents Contended That the Appointments Were Back-Door Entries in Violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

21 Apr 2017

The judgment pertains to five writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 16th November 2015 by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Trial Court Order on Memo and Injunction Application in Pending Partition Suit. Plaintiff Challenges Order Allowing Bank's Memo and Rejecting Interim Relief Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

24 Aug 2023

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated Writ Petitions challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order denying regularization of daily wage teachers. The Court considered arguments on applicability of Umadevi and Nihal Singh precedents and the government's regularization policy.

24 Jul 2018

The matter involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay against a common order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)