Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Merit. Termination of Workman Found Illegal as Domestic Inquiry Was Not Held and Employer Failed to Prove Misconduct.

The petitioner, M/s TTK Healthcare Ltd, an employer engaged in the manufacture of ready-to-eat food products, challenged the award dated 28.02.2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PC Act Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Babulal Pardeshi, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik, in Special Case No.11 of 2012 for offences under Sections 7, 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer, Restores Dismissal of Employee for Corruption. Acquittal in Criminal Trial Due to Hostile Witnesses Does Not Bar Departmental Proceedings Based on Different Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prior sanction under Section 19 was not obtained and trap witnesses were not independent.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sinc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Hawaldar in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a Police Hawaldar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Karad for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1000 from the complainant to av...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policeman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, a policeman attached to the Highway Security Squad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2)...