Search Results for "Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Land Allotment and Compensation for Deficit Area in Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement Under Rehabilitation Policy and Orders Were Not Quashed.

The petitioners, Rukmini Dattatraya Tirawade and Vikram Hari Palkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Failure to Implead Legal Heirs of Deceased Owner Not Fatal. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Without Considering Application for Substitution Filed Before Signing of Judgment.

The appellants, legal heirs of deceased Bajirao Laxman Thorat, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Mot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Reference Under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Profits on Sale of Machinery Not Taxable Under Section 41(2) as Depreciation Was Claimed by Dissolved Firm, Not by Assessee.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the opinion of the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, not as a prospective purchaser.

The appellant, M/s Multicon Builders, a registered partnership firm through its partner Suryakant Gendasingh Thakur, was the original defendant no.9 i...