Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2491 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2491 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

17 Feb 2016

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies That Appeal Under Section 72(4) of Bombay Public Trusts Act is a Regular Appeal Not Subject to Section 100 CPC Limitations. Full Bench Holds That Such Appeal Permits Full Rehearing on Both Facts and Law, Overruling Earlier Division Bench View That It is a Second Appeal Requiring Substantial Questions of Law.

1 Apr 2016

The dispute originated from two rival Change Reports filed under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, concerning the management committee of a public t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in Securities Scam Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Petitioners were directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy in securities transactions, but the court found no prima facie case and held that the 25-year delay violated their right to speedy trial.

22 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Dhyan Investments & Trading Company Ltd. and Tushar Sarda, were accused nos. 3 and 4 in Special Case No.2 of 1998 pending before the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Order in Property Dispute — Appellants' Right to Use Property Not Barred by Limitation or Acquiescence. Court holds that temporary injunction cannot be granted based on mere possession without clear legal right and that delay in filing suit does not automatically disentitle relief if substantial rights are involved.

28 Jul 2023

The case involves an appeal filed by the defendants/appellants against an order dated 01.03.2023 passed by the III Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in Malegaon Bomb Blast Case. Accused Charged Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Serious Offences Seeks Release Pending Trial.

25 Apr 2017

The appeal arose from the rejection of a bail application by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and the Nati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)