Search Results for "FSL Report"

562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010496092017_1

The present matters are two criminal appeals filed against the judgment of acquittal rendered by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder under Section 302 IPC and Against Non-Imposition of Fine. The Court Examined the Evidentiary Value of Oral Dying Declaration and the Requirement of Imposition of Fine under Section 302 IPC.

The case concerns the murder of A.C. Yathisha on 03.04.2013. The prosecution alleged that the accused, Rajegowda @ Guruswamy, assaulted the deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. Accused persons challenged their conviction arguing that the prosecution relied on interested witnesses and contradictory evidence.

The two criminal appeals before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the same occurrence and challenged the judgment of conviction and order of sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Possessing Panther Skin Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Possession of Scheduled Animal Skin Without License is an Offence Under Sections 40, 44, 48A, 49B, 51 of the Act.

The applicants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Joint Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amravati, for contravention of Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and Murder. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The appeal arises from the judgment of conviction dated 08.11.2017 by the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, in Ses...