Search Results for "Dishonour of cheque"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Bombay High Court Order Setting Aside Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A NI Act. Signatory of Cheque Authorized by Company is 'Drawer' Liable for Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant company entered into agreements with Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd. (Cane) and made advance payments of Rs.63,46,00,000/- for supply of s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case Despite Complainant's Unwillingness to Compound After Full Payment. Compensatory Jurisprudence Prioritized Over Punitive Aspect Where Entire Cheque Amount and Interest Paid.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Dishonour of Cheque - Presumption under Section 139 rebutted by accused showing loan was time-barred, hence not legally enforceable.

The present revision petition was filed by the accused (petitioner) challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Concurrent Findings of Conviction Upheld. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The present criminal revision petition was filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the concurrent findings of con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complaint by Constituted Attorney in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Reinstates Process Quashed by Sessions Court. Constituted Attorney Can File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on Behalf of Payee.

The petitioner, Vilas Baliram Sawant, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which quashed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Summary Criminal Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Trial Must Be De Novo After Transfer Under Section 326 CrPC. The Court held that in summary trials, the successor Magistrate cannot act on evidence recorded by predecessor and must conduct de novo trial.

The applicant, Jaikishan Kanjiwani, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, M/s Kumar Matc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Quashed as Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Shabbir Abdul Rahman Shaikh, was the original accused in a complaint filed by the respondent, Parnerkar Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Ma...