Search Results for "Compromise memo"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of CRPF Constable Challenging Dismissal for Theft of Ammunition. The court upheld the disciplinary action, finding no procedural irregularities and that the punishment of dismissal was proportionate to the grave misconduct of stealing arms and ammunition.

The petitioner, Sharad Bhaskar Manekar, was a Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) appointed on 1.1.1997. While posted at Nagpur and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Slum Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 3 of Karnataka Slum Areas Act. Landowners succeed in challenging slum declaration due to lack of prior publication and consideration of objections.

The petitioners, owners of land in Mandya District, challenged a notification dated 07.01.2013 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya, declaring th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit Barred by Limitation. Suit for declaration of title and partition filed after 12 years from date of knowledge of adverse possession held time-barred under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The present Second Appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 7th October 1991 of the Additional District Judge, Pune, in Civil Appeal No.265 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 452 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness failed to identify accused and medical evidence did not support prosecution version.

The appellant, Kailas Sopan Jade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 452 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Relevance of Age Statement in Will Under Evidence Act Sections 32(5)&(6) and Admissibility of Secondary Evidence. Legal Principles on Will Execution and Burden of Proof Clarified; Endorsement on Birth Register Held Inadmissible Without Examination of Its Writer.

The case concerned a Hindu male who executed a will three days before his death, bequeathing all his properties absolutely to his mother. In the will,...