Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act Eviction"

1058 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1058 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Construction — Finds Appellate Court's Reversal Not Perverse. Landlord Failed to Plead Original Condition of Premises Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioner, Hemant Bharat Kachare, as landlord, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 16 February 1999 passed by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Suit Block Established; Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment Proved.

The petitioner, Abdul Gani, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 195/2013 seeking eviction of the respondent-tenant, Dilip Gopaldas Duwani, fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Reversioners' Suit for Possession Against Tenant of Life Tenant. Life Tenant's Lease Does Not Survive Her Death; Tenant Becomes Trespasser.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in a second appeal, which reversed the trial court's decree for possession i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Default in Rent Payment Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent findings of courts below that tenant was defaulter upheld as no substantial question of law arose under Article 227.

The petitioner-tenant filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurrent findings of the trial court and ...