Search Results for "Article 300-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Article 300-A"

355 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 355 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Compensation Application in Land Acquisition Case — Failure to Issue Section 6 Notification Does Not Bar Compensation for Dispossessed Landowner. The Court held that the State cannot deny compensation to a landowner whose land has been taken over without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and delay and laches cannot be raised as a defence in such circumstances.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sopan Dorge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, seeking dire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Army's Challenge to High-Rise Construction Near Defence Establishment — No Statutory Mandate for NOC Under Work of Defence Act, 1903. Guidelines for No Objection Certificate from Local Military Authority are administrative instructions without force of law, and construction already completed and occupied cannot be directed to be demolished.

11 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Station HQ Kamptee (a defence establishment), filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to stop construction of a high-rise building (K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Acquisition Lapses as Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Despite Possession Taken.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioners, original owners of land at Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their land by CIDCO under the Land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Sakleshpur Town — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition for widening of B.M. Road was a routine development activity and the provisions of Sections 24 and 38 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 were not mandatory for such acquisitions.

14 Jan 2019

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 20 petitioners, who are owners of properties situated on B.M. Road in Sakleshpur town, Hassan Dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Maintainability of Suit Challenging Slum Acquisition Proceedings. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Bar Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

22 Feb 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 12 April 2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.2862 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.

23 Dec 2013

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Highway Project Under Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964 — Petitioner's Alternative Alignment Proposal Rejected as Unfeasible. Court upholds validity of Sections 15 to 19 of the Act, holding that the acquisition process was valid and the petitioner's objections were duly considered.

4 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Sri Sannarangappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Modvat Credit Lapse Provisions in Finance Act, 1999. Retrospective Validation of Rules Causing Lapse of Accumulated Credit Upheld as Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

23 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Coral Cosmetics Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered as a Small Scale Industry, was engaged in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of TDS Refund Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Establish That Payments to Foreign Collaborator Were Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) Read with DTAA.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, M/s BASF (India) Limited and Mr. P.A. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February 2001 passed by the Co...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)