Search Results for "witness summoning"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "witness summoning"

355 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 355 result(s)

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Him to Cannabis Cultivation. Prosecution Failed to Prove Beyond Reasonable Doubt That Accused Was Cultivator Where Land Had Multiple Occupiers and Investigation Did Not Verify Specific Cultivation, Under Section 20(a)(i) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

7 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20(a)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellant was sentenc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Corporate Dispute Due to Abuse of Process and Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the dispute was essentially civil, involving financial transactions and agreements between corporates, and the criminal case was initiated with malicious intent, violating principles of fairness under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

11 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court addressed appeals challenging the dismissal of petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Denial of Cross-Examination Right. Conviction under Sections 448 and 376 IPC r/w Section 5(j)(ii) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as accused was not given opportunity to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, violating principles of natural justice.

23 Dec 2020

The appellant, Govindaraju @ Kutti, was convicted by the LIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in Special CC No.527/2016 for offen...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Suit for Mandatory Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Entrustment of Gold Necklace. The court held that the plaintiff did not establish the alleged entrustment of a golden Kaasinasara to the defendant and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963.

31 Dec 2019

The appellant, D.M. Krishna, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint Proceedings — Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination. The court held that the Magistrate has discretion to permit the complainant to lead further evidence after the accused's evidence in a private complaint case, setting aside the order rejecting such application.

13 Jul 2018

The respondent (complainant) filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. alleging that the petitioner (accused No.1) married another woman (ac...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Allowing Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint. Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination of Complainant After Accused's Evidence.

13 Jul 2018

The case involves a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner (accused No.1) against the respondent (complainant). The respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant in Dishonour of Cheque Cases, Holding That Territorial Jurisdiction Lies Where the Cheque Is Presented for Encashment Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Cheques Payable at Par Confer Jurisdiction at the Drawee Bank Branch Where Presented.

7 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Helcino Aleixo Fernandes, a businessman residing in Majorda, Goa, filed nine complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Against Order Closing Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion to Close Evidence Upheld When Plaintiff Failed to Produce Witnesses Despite Multiple Adjournments and Non-Compliance with Order 16 CPC.

9 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s M.M. Corporation, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order dated 23...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Criminal Trespass and Insult in Company Premises — Lack of Intent to Insult or Annoy and Absence of Criminal Trespass Elements. The court held that entry into a cabin to serve summons, without intent to insult or annoy, does not constitute criminal trespass under Section 447 IPC, and that mere pointing of finger without provocation to breach of peace does not attract Section 504 IPC.

27 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Shailesh H. Bajaj, was an accused in Criminal Case No. 147/04/C pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panaji, Goa, aris...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 138 NI Act and Directs Magistrates to Accept Complaints Without Preliminary Inquiry. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is constitutionally valid and Section 200 CrPC does not require preliminary inquiry in cheque dishonour cases.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the p...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)