Search Results for "trademark dispute"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Applications. Court holds that failure to issue notice under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 before removal of marks from register renders removal invalid, and marks must be treated as continuing on register.

The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under Nos. 312470, 312472, and 312473, which were renewed up to 17 February 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Renewal Applications. Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prevents Removal of Marks from Register.

The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under the mark 'MOTWANE' bearing registration numbers 312470, 312472, and 31247...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interim Injunction in Franchise Dispute Over Trademark Use. Negative Covenant in Franchise Agreement Restrains Use of Mark Containing 'Kamats' After Termination.

The dispute arose out of a franchise agreement dated 24 March 2011 between Deepak Thorat (Petitioner) and Vidli Restaurant Ltd. (Respondent), with Vit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...