Search Results for "summoning order"

756 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 756 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Police Interference in Gold Loan Business Arbitrary and Violative of Fundamental Rights. Writ of Mandamus Issued Restraining Police from Seizing Pledged Gold Articles, Allowing Only Examination by Summoning.

The petitioner, Muthoot Finance Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of gold loans, filed a writ pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Against Politician in Defamation Case for Alleged Remarks Against RSS — Statements Not Defamatory as They Did Not Refer to Complainant or Any Identifiable Individual.

The petitioner, Rahul Gandhi, a Member of Parliament and Vice President of the Indian National Congress, filed a criminal writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Magistrate's Refusal to Summon Witnesses in Private Complaint Case. Court holds that the complainant has a right to examine witnesses and the Magistrate cannot refuse to summon them on the ground that they are not cited in the complaint.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Shriram Sharma, is the complainant in S.C.C. No. 1292/2009 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pachora, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Summoning of Witness After Prosecution Closed Evidence in Murder Trial. Court holds that summoning a witness after closure of evidence and examination of accused under Section 313 CrPC causes prejudice to accused.

The applicant, Chandrashekhar Vinayak Wargane, was the sole accused in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2012 before the Sessions Court at Amravati for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...