Search Results for "subjective test"

339 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 339 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Case — Live Link Between Grounds and Purpose Snapped. Unexplained delay of 19 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ramani, mother of the detenu Kannan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 42 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Tmt. Valarmathi, mother of the detenu Thiru Jayaprakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained delay of 37 days snaps the 'live and proximate link' between grounds of detention and purpose of detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sarojini, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 29.07.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...