Search Results for "specified domestic transactions"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court hears writ petitions challenging FIR in alleged corruption and land encroachment matter. Petitioners (an ex-MLA and a municipal commissioner) seek quashing of FIR No.4/2017 under PC Act and IPC, arguing political rivalry.

The case pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Enquiry Found Fair and Findings Not Perverse. Part-I Award of Industrial Tribunal Confirmed as No Violation of Natural Justice or Principles of Evidence.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Shinde, an employee of Maharashtra Gramin Bank (a Regional Rural Bank established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Discharge, and Signature on Cheque Was Admitted.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by R. Hanumantharaya (the accused) against the judgment and order dated 02-01-2019 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...