Search Results for "semen"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Car Washer for Rape and Criminal Trespass — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Alfred Fernandes, was convicted by the Fast Track Special Court, POCSO, Panaji, Goa, for offences under Sections 448, 354 and 376 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(c) IPC — Acquittal of Other Accused and Lesser Offences Upheld. Appellant's Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence, No Interference Warranted.

The case involves an appeal by accused No.1, Vasant Mahadeo Powar, against his conviction under Section 376(2)(c) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Gang Rape, Criminal Trespass, and Criminal Intimidation — Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 448, 506(II) read with Section 34 IPC confirmed.

The case arises from an incident during the intervening night of 27/08/1991 and 28/08/1991 at about 1:00 a.m., when the appellants Dinesh Tukaram Tela...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Poisoning Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 376 and 328 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sheshappa Gowda, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore in Spl.Case No.4/2008...