Search Results for "section 22A"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Environmental Society's Appeal Against Road Construction on River Bed. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction due to bar under Section 487 of BPMC Act, 1949, and society lacks locus standi as no special damage proved.

The appellant, Parisar, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, working for conservation of nature and environment, filed a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extra-judicial confession to police officer is barred by Section 25 of Evidence Act and recovery of weapon does not establish guilt.

The appellant, Shashikant Shantaram Bhandari, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his aunt Vatsala under Section 302 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Husband in Dowry Death Case — Conviction Under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Confirmed Based on Consistent Evidence of Harassment and Demand for Dowry

The appellant, Jalal Siddiqui Mulla, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.773 of 2010 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Hired Car Driver Stabbing Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and motive established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Mazharkhan Saidkhan Pathan, a driver of an Innova c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 Read with 511 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Story of Attempted Rape.

The appellant, Shankar Thakre, was convicted by the Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial 33/2002 for offences under Section 363 ...