Search Results for "search before Gazetted officer"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Disabled Army Veteran as ITAT Member -- Quashes Compulsory Retirement Finding Mala Fide Actions and Departmental Vendetta -- Upholds SCSC Recommendations in Writ Petition Under Article 32

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition filed by Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj against the Union of India and another respondent -- The petitioner, a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Ramanna S/o Tirkappa Yerimani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Savanur in C.C. No. 04/2013 for offences under the Narcotic ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in NDPS Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The applicant, Jhamsingh s/o Kedarsingh Jamadar, was convicted by the trial court for possession of 3 kg 200 grams of ganja under the Narcotic Drugs a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Conscious Possession of Heroin. Recovery of Contraband from Bag Not Linked to Accused as Independent Witnesses Turned Hostile and Procedural Lapses in Search and Seizure Under NDPS Act, 1985.

The appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai, against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.10.2008 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...