Search Results for "sales tax exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "sales tax exemption"

213 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Deemed Dealer under MVAT Act and Prospective Effect of Tax Liability. High Court of Bombay Decides on Tax Liability of Government-Constituted Trust under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

3 Mar 2025

On the Issue of Deemed Dealer: The Court held that SASF was a “deemed dealer” under Section 2(8) of the MVAT Act. The Court found that SASF fel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Jurisdiction Case — Decree Passed After Act's Applicability Is Void. Civil Court Loses Jurisdiction Once Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Applies to Area; Decree Passed Thereafter Is Void Ab Initio.

20 Apr 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the tenant-appellants against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had dismissed their revisi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Concessional Octroi Rate for Industrial Raw Materials Under Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to 50% concessional octroi on raw materials under Item 4 of Chapter I as per Administrator's communication dated 03-04-1991, and directed refund of excess collected with interest.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Bharat General and Textile Industries Limited, a textile manufacturing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in EPF Act Case — Company Entitled to Infancy Period. Functional integrality not established between two companies despite common ownership; Section 16(1)(d) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 applies to newly set up establishment.

7 Jul 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur, challenging the order of the Employees' Provident Fund A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Marketer in Weights and Measures Case — Manufacturer Already Convicted and Fined for Non-Declaration of Retail Sale Price Under Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.

5 Dec 2006

The applicants, Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Employees' Provident Funds Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Software Consultancy Services Not Covered Under Notification Dated 17th May 1971 Issued Under Section 1(3)(b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in EPF Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Computer consultancy not covered under notification dated 17th May 1971 extending Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments rendering expert services.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal that it...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)