Search Results for "relevancy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "relevancy"

272 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 272 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Appeal in Partition and Mandatory Injunction Suits — Property Acquired During Marriage is Joint Family Property Under Section 27 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The court held that the wife's contributions to the household and her role as a homemaker gave her a right to claim partition and mandatory injunction.

21 Mar 2025

The appellant, Sunil Abraham, and the respondent, Reeth Abraham (also known as Reeth Devaiah), were married and later divorced. During the marriage, t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 448 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

21 Mar 2025

The appellant, Sri Annappa Bhandary, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) in S.C.No.29/2018 for o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder of Shantabai Potdar, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapons, and motive.

24 Mar 2011

The case pertains to the murder of Shantabai Potdar, who was found dead in her residential quarter on 25.01.2008. The appellants, Ajit Ashokrao Garje ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Convict Son for Killing Mother. Property Dispute Motive Established; Failure to Explain Death Under Section 106 Evidence Act Strengthens Prosecution Case.

21 Feb 2011

The appellant, Ashok Sahebrao Borude, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for the murder of his mother, Sakharbai, under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Production of Substitute Survey Report in Pending Suit Due to Witness Incapacity — Order VIII Rule 1A CPC. The court held that inability of a witness to depose due to illness is a valid ground for permitting production of a substitute document, and the trial court's refusal caused serious prejudice to the defendant.

9 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Confrarias Reunidas Da Igreja De Panjim, represented by its constituted attorney Olavo Dias, filed a writ petition challenging the ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Juvenile Age Determination Case — Appellant Entitled to Be Tried as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The court held that in case of doubt regarding age, the benefit must go to the accused, and the school leaving certificate is reliable evidence of age under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

13 Jul 2010

The appellant, Mohammad Javed Abdul Wahid Shaikh, was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Commissioner's Report Admissible Without Examining Commissioner as Witness. Courts Below Erred in Ignoring Commissioner's Report and Map on Ground of Non-Examination of Commissioner, Contrary to Order 26 Rule 10(2) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

5 Jul 2010

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a second appeal against the concurrent dismissal of their suit for declaration of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jul 2010

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Apr 2010

The appellant, Chandrakant Digambar Tanksale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Mohan, his cousin, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Lack of Independent Witnesses Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves six appellants who were convicted by the trial court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)