Search Results for "promotion affected"

712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Appointment as Senior Scientific Officer Due to Lack of Merit and Delay. Petitioner's claim for notional appointment and seniority rejected as he was not selected on merit and the challenge to selection was belated.

The petitioner, D. Kumar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 14.11.2022 passed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010218752018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversion of Head Clerk to Senior Clerk. Reversion Upheld as Petitioner Was Junior to Respondent No. 5 and Appointment Was Subject to Seniority Determination Under Maharashtra University Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Khalil Ahamad Khan, was employed as a Senior Clerk at Amolakchand Mahavidyalaya, Yavatmal. He was promoted to Head Clerk on 01.06.2006...