Search Results for "payee's bank account"

361 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 361 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Cheque Issued as Security for Advance of Rs.80 Lakh Dishonoured — Accused Failed to Prove Absence of Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by HMT (International) Limited, a public limited company, against M/s Nucor Wires Limited and its directors (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant could not establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability as invoices were raised in name of third party, not the accused.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the complainant, M/s. Shradha Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd., against the judgment of the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...