Search Results for "partial reliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "partial reliance"

563 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 563 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeals Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings. The Commission set aside the common order dated 11.09.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of execution applications under Sections 25 and 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard appeals (AE No. 73/2024 and AE No. 74/2024) filed by the complainant/decree holder, ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Possession — Directions Issued for Compliance Under Sections 25 and 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decree holder is entitled to pursue both execution remedies simultaneously without being compelled to elect between them.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves execution appeals filed by the decree holder, Kishore Bhardwaj, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 of the State Consumer Disput...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings — Compliance of Decree for Possession or Refund with Interest. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the execution applications for fresh adjudication, keeping all contentions open.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal by Kishore Bhardwaj, the complainant/decree holder, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the State Consumer D...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit, Reinstating Decree for Redemption. Purchaser from Mortgagor Held Necessary Party in Foreclosure Suit Under Order XXXIV Rule 1 CPC, and Right to Redeem Not Extinguished by Decree Against Original Mortgagors Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

17 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from a mortgage redemption suit involving land mortgaged in 1954. The plaintiff purchased the mortgaged land via registered sale dee...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Fatal Head Injury Despite Acquittal of Co-Accused. The Court held that the sole eyewitness testimony, corroborated by medical evidence and recovery, was sufficient to sustain the conviction for murder.

15 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal by Kripal Singh against his conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Yashwant. The incident occurred on 28 July ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging NEET PG 2016 Answer Key — No Grounds to Interfere with Expert Committee's Determination. Court held that judicial review of answer keys is limited to cases of patent errors and that the expert committee's opinion is entitled to deference unless shown to be perverse.

29 Jul 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the answer keys for the NEET PG 2016 examination. The petitioners, Dr. Ashish Mishra an...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Held That Plaintiff Was Not in Possession and That Defendants Were in Possession.

1 Oct 2013

The appellant, Nagarathnamma, was the plaintiff in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds HUF Claim Over Share Income in Partnership Firm — Unilateral Declaration Valid When Supported by HUF Funds and Consistent Assessments. Income from 6% share in B. Mehta & Co. held to belong to HUF headed by M.D. Vora, not individual assessee, based on investment of HUF capital and subsequent consistent treatment in HUF assessments.

12 Jul 2005

The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, M. D. Vora. The dispute pertained to ...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)