Search Results for "minor secured"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Non-Compliance of Order in Matrimonial Dispute. Court holds that contempt proceedings are not a substitute for execution and require proof of willful disobedience beyond reasonable doubt.

The complainant, Srirupa Roy, filed a contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Obalesha @ Ranga, was convicted by the Fast Track Sessions Court-XVI, Bangalore City, in S.C.No.305/2011 for offences under Sections 36...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Asif Pasha @ Asif, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, for the murder of one person under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by NWKRTC Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Cross Objections Dismissed. Negligence of Deceased Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Applicable, and Multiplier Correctly Applied Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 24.12.2006 involving a KSRTC bus (driven by respondent No.4, Manjunath) and a stationary NWKRTC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Employee. Negligence of Driver and Owner Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...