Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order — Live and Proximate Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Mohankumar @ Raja, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Unexplained delay of 46 days between arrest and detention order renders subjective satisfaction doubtful under preventive detention law.

The petitioner, G. Annakili, wife of the detenu Gunasekaran, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 9 months and 21 days between arrest and detention order held to be fatal, vitiating the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 13.06.2012 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Representation Not Considered Before Confirmation. Failure to Consider Representation Before Confirmation Under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2.4.2004 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange...