High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Chinese Company Challenging DRAT Order in Debt Recovery Matter — Maintainability of Writ Against Interlocutory Orders Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The court held that a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is not maintainable against an interlocutory order passed by the DRAT in a pending appeal, as the petitioner has an alternative remedy of statutory appeal under Section 20 of the RDB Act.
8 Jan 2018The petitioner, Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation, a Chinese company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution...




