Search Results for "instrument securing money"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Guardianship Case — Child's Welfare Paramount. Consent of Biological Parents and Child's Best Interests Justify Granting Guardianship to Prospective Adoptive Parents Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge dated 30th November 2004 dismissing the appellants' petition for guardianship. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Sale Deed Challenged as Void for Non-Compliance with Section 7 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, but Court Found No Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Navinchand Khushalchand Mutha against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in a suit for de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale Deed.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of three agricultural properties. He claimed to have...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Expeditious Disposal of Execution Case and Restoration of Conviction — Execution Case Already Disposed, Conviction Set Aside on Appeal. No Mandamus Issued as Relief Sought Became Infructuous.

The petitioner, Mr. Hemachandra M. Kuppalli, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...