Search Results for "fiscal statute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "fiscal statute"

354 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.

13 Mar 2026

The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants in Maharashtra Rent Control Act Case for Non-Payment of Rent and Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact on default and unauthorized subletting under Sections 15, 16, 17 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, affirmed by High Court, not interfered with by Supreme Court.

1 Jan 2026

The batch of appeals arose from eviction decrees passed against tenants under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The appellants, tenants of indus...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Gujarat Sales Tax Act Case Due to No Breach of Exemption Conditions and Application of Promissory Estoppel. The assessee was entitled to exemption under Entry No.255(2) of Notification dated 05.03.1992 as raw materials were used in the eligible unit, and subsequent amendments did not retroactively impose liabilities, upholding the principle of promissory estoppel under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.

21 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of its tax appeals, which upheld the Gujarat Value Added Tax T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

2 Jun 2021

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Manufacturers in Sikkim Seeking Exemption from Education Cess and NCCD. Exemption Notification Strictly Construed; Cesses Not Covered as They Were Imposed by Separate Finance Acts After the Notification.

19 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by M/s. Unicorn Industries and Akshay Ispat and Ferro Alloys Private Limited against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)