Search Results for "evidentiary value"

1094 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1094 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction and Life Imprisonment for Triple Murder Under Sections 302 and 499 IPC. Accused Challenges Reliability of Eye-Witnesses in Dark Night, Non-Examination of Independent Witnesses, and Lack of Ballistic Expert Report.

Background: The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 16.5.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.93/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Land Dispute — Patta Claim Fails for Lack of Original Title Documents. Notification Under Repealed Act Not Invalid if Consistent with New Law; Revenue Entries Without Supporting Documents Lack Evidentiary Value.

The case involves a dispute over 600 acres of land in Survey No. 81, Kalvalanagaram Village, Khammam District (now in Telangana). The Appellants claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Life Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Love Affair. The court held that the prosecution established a complete chain of circumstances under Sections 302, 201, and 120-B IPC, including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon.

The appellants, Bhupendrakumar Naginbhai Mayavanshi and another, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No.42 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...