Search Results for "evidence gathering"

333 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chandrakant Baburao Musane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for the murder of his father-in-law under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Inconsistencies and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(m) IPC and Section 6 read with 5 of POCSO Act set aside as medical evidence contradicted prosecution story and testimony of victim and mother had contradictions.

The appellant, Rajesh S/o Rajan Nair, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada, for offences under Section 376(2)(m) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Parents-in-Law in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Demand for Rs.20,000 for Jeep Loan Not Sufficient to Prove Instigation or Cruelty Under Sections 306 and 498-A IPC.

The case pertains to the death of Alkabai, who was married to Ravsaheb Patil (appellant no.1, since deceased). After about a year of marriage, the hus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder and Atrocity Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Circumstantial Evidence Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 120(B), 114 IPC and Section 3(2)(4) of SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 07.02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by a Private Limited Company Against Individuals. The Matters Are Consolidally Heard and Disposed of Under the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction of the Court.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, exercising its civil appellate jurisdiction, heard six writ petitions (Nos. 4768, 4771, 4785, 4787, 4774, and ...