Search Results for "death benefit fund"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Insurance Nomination Dispute — Nominee Cannot Override Succession Rights Under Hindu Succession Act. Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 does not confer absolute title on nominee; nominee holds policy benefits as trustee for legal heirs.

The case involves a dispute between the appellant, Smt. Neelavva @ Neelamma, and the respondents, Smt. Chandravva @ Chandrakala @ Hema and her minor s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal Against Notional Service Extension for Pension; Dismisses Employee's Cross Appeal for Arrears of Salary. Belated Judicial Approach After Superannuation Disentitles Employee to Parity with Timely Filer and Extended Benefits.

The case involved cross writ appeals arising from a Single Judge's order in a writ petition filed by V. Perumal, a former Gang Master of Tenkasi Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of No Joint Purchase Upheld. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Partition Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Purchase of Suit Property in 1957.

The case involves a property dispute between descendants of two brothers, Ramchandra Ingole and Trimbakrao Ingole, who had partitioned joint family pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...