Search Results for "custom and practice"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.

The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Pension Dispute with Institute Employees — State Not Liable for Pension Payments Under Institute's Self-Funded Scheme. Board Resolution Explicitly Stated No Separate Grant Would Be Sought from Government for Retirement Benefits.

The present appeal arises from a dispute between the State of Bihar and employees of the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna, re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Credit Card Recovery Suit — Reduces Usurious Interest Rate of 2.5% per Month Compounded Monthly to 6% per Annum Simple. Contractual interest held unconscionable and against public policy under Section 34 CPC.

The appellant, B. Gopa Kumar, was a credit card holder of Canara Bank (respondent) and was issued a Cancard-Visa card in 1998. He defaulted on payment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitration Award Against Guarantors in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Guarantors Not Liable for Enhanced Credit Facility Without Their Consent. Guarantor Liability Cannot Be Extended Beyond Original Guarantee Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common undated arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Revision Petition in Section 133 CrPC Right of Way Dispute. Dispute over easementary rights between Mundkars held to be of civil nature, not amenable to summary proceedings under Section 133 CrPC.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by Shri Laxman alias Bala Govekar (petitioner) against an order of the learned Sessions Judge, Ma...