Search Results for "contempt of court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "contempt of court"

256 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Encroachment Dispute After Survey Reveals Patta Land. Revenue Authorities Have No Power to Evict Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for Private Land; Civil Remedy Available.

1 Apr 2026

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 27.06.20...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Wilful Disobedience Due to Limitation Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petition Filed After 7.5 Years from Order Date Held Barred by Limitation.

1 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Kulandaivelu, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Wilful Disobedience Due to Limitation — Delay of 7.5 Years in Filing Contempt Petition Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Is Barred by Limitation.

1 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Kulandaivelu, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petitions as Petitioners' Counsel Concedes No Cause to Prosecute Contemnor for Wilful Disobedience of Orders in Writ Petitions. The court accepted the submission that no cause exists to prosecute the contemnor under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and closed the petitions without any further proceedings.

30 Mar 2026

The case involves two contempt petitions filed by Thulasiraman and V. Lakshmanan against K. Hariram, Assistant Director/Administrator of MRL Industria...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Substantial Compliance in Water Body Encroachment Case. Court Directs Cancellation of 1969 Assignment Before Removal of Remaining Encroachment.

26 Mar 2026

The contempt petition was filed by A. Arumugam under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Lack of Wilful Disobedience — Direction to Consider Patta Application Deemed Complied Upon Rejection. The court held that consideration of an application, even if resulting in rejection, satisfies a direction to 'consider' and does not amount to contempt under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

25 Mar 2026

The contempt petition was filed by Syed Moula against the Tahsildar, Denkanikottai Taluk, and another, alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Managing Director in Service Benefits Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that contempt for non-compliance of interim orders is not maintainable when the interim order has merged with the final order and compliance has been effected.

25 Mar 2026

The case involves multiple contempt petitions filed by legal heirs of deceased employees of Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited again...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Electricity Connection in Property Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Electricity Supply Despite Title Dispute as Disconnection Violated Court Orders and Natural Justice. The court held that the electricity company must restore the connection immediately as the disconnection was illegal and in contempt of court orders under the Electricity Act, 2003 and Article 21 of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Laljibhai Hirabhai Rabari, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 16, 19, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India read ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Electricity Connection in Property Dispute — Holds That Disconnection by Electricity Company Without Following Due Process Under Electricity Act, 2003 Is Illegal and Contemptuous of Court Orders. The Court directed immediate restoration of supply to the petitioner, emphasizing that electricity is a fundamental right under Article 21 and cannot be arbitrarily disconnected.

20 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Pravinbhai Sankarbhai Rabari, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 16, 19, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India re...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Electricity Connection in Property Dispute. Disconnection by Electricity Company Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003 and Violation of Court Orders.

20 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Dineshbhai Govindbhai Desai, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 16, 19, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India rea...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)