Search Results for "benefit of doubt"

1655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Medical Evidence Does Not Corroborate Ocular Testimony.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 29.12.2006 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, acquitting the respondents (original...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits All Appellants in Rioting and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 25th April 1991 at about 7:00 p.m. in village Jalgaon-Supe, Taluka Baramati, District Pune, where a group of 30-40...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Akhtar s/o Abaskhan Pathan, was charged with offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony lacked corroboration and delay in lodging FIR was not satisfactorily explained.

The appellant, Mansing Nana Shinde, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by other witnesses.

The case pertains to the murder of Sk.Abid, an auto rickshaw driver, on the night of 8th September 2009. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal by seven accused persons convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Session Trial No.19 of 2011 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sangeeta Raju Shinde, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the victim, Khurshid Yakub Shai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification of accused in a dacoity committed in the dead of night was based on weak evidence and interested witnesses, leading to acquittal under Section 395 IPC.

The appellants, Uttam Shivram Shinde and Madhukar Shivram Shinde, were convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No....