Search Results for "arms recovery"

416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC in Dismemberment Murder Case. Accused Challenge Life Imprisonment Contending Weak Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Witnesses.

The case involved the brutal murder and dismemberment of Archideb Bhattacharjee in 2003 after he refused to pay an extortion demand of Rs.40,000 to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The appellant, Vishal Ashok Kamble, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of one person under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Recovery of Firearm. Dying declaration made to wife and brother held reliable despite absence of medical corroboration.

The case involves three appellants convicted for the murder of Nagender Yadav. The incident occurred on the intervening night of 15th and 16th May 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Life Sentence of Accused in Quadruple Murder Case Under IPC and Arms Act. Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony of Injured Survivor and Recovery of Incriminating Articles, with Death Penalty Enhancement Denied as Case Not Rarest of Rare.

The Supreme Court dealt with criminal appeals arising from a gruesome murder case where four family members were killed and one injured. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case at Court Complex — Common Intention Established Under Section 149 IPC. Appellants convicted for murder and other offences based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, with no merit found in defence of false implication.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals against a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had upheld the conviction of the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Land Dispute.

The case arises from a family land dispute between the Gholap family. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 2 are from the same original Gholap famil...