Search Results for "Unfair Labour Practice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Unfair Labour Practice"

788 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 788 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Corporation's Appeals Against Reinstatement of Daily Wage Workers. Daily wage employees with 240 days of continuous service are entitled to reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

24 Dec 2025

The case involves multiple Letters Patent Appeals filed by the Divisional Manager, Forest Development Corporation, Nashik, against the reinstatement o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

28 Sep 2018

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

26 Oct 2016

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition and Allows Employee's Petition in Service Dispute Over Dismissal on Unproven Charges. Employer Cannot Use Loss of Confidence to Bypass Disciplinary Proceedings When Charges of Misconduct Are Not Proved.

22 Jan 2015

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an Industrial Court order dated 12 July 2005. The employer, Agricultural Produce Market Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily Wage Employee Terminated for Absence Without Inquiry — Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment or Conduct Domestic Inquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act. Termination of a daily wage employee for 15 days' unauthorized absence without holding a domestic inquiry was held to be an unfair labour practice under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and the employee was entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

28 Sep 2010

The Administrator of Kalyan Municipal Corporation challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which found the termination of Respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

14 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Dismissal of Workman Void for Non-Compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer's Failure to Seek Approval for Termination After Domestic Enquiry Renders Dismissal an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

31 Mar 2005

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the order of the Labour Court, Nashik, which held that the dismissal of the workma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)