Search Results for "Sole Eye-Witness"

486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Hostile Witness Testimony. Section 106 of Evidence Act Applied to Shift Burden on Accused to Explain Injuries in Shared Household.

The appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of the appellant's wife, Saira. The marriage was in 1982, and they had a daug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.

The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent to Kill. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as injuries were not on vital parts and no intention to cause death was established.

The appellant, Sanjay Gaonkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative of deceased and testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants challenging their conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Lack of Negligence Proof. Claimants Failed to Establish Rash and Negligent Driving by Truck Driver, Resulting in Setting Aside of Tribunal's Award.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness with material contradictions.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 3 and 4) along with three other co-accused were tried. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a chance witness with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellants, Mahendra Madansingh Thakur and Dinesh @ Guddu Pratapsingh Thakur, were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian ...