Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

1550 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1550 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking to Treat Oral Dictation as Final Order — Signed Order Prevails Over Dictation in Open Court. The Court held that the signed order uploaded on 12.02.2026 is the binding order, not the oral dictation, and the Judge has the right to change the order until it is signed under Order XII of the Supreme Court Rules.

12 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed by respondents in a disposed civil appeal, seeking clarification that the order dictated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Order Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Partition and Declaration. Trial Court Found No Cause of Action and Allowed Application Filed by Defendants 24 and 26; Appeal Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Triable Issues.

29 Jun 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiffs against the order dated 14.10.2019...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi hears batch of motor accident claim appeals under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appeals contest various awards by different tribunals, but the judgment text lacks substantive reasoning, so the court’s findings and final orders are not ascertainable.

22 Dec 2020

The present batch of 24 miscellaneous first appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, came before the High Court of Karnataka at K...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Decides Appeals Against MACT Award in Motor Accident Claims. Parties Dispute Compensation Amount and Liability of Insurers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

28 Mar 2019

...

High Court

KAHC030020522019_1

22 Dec 2020

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Petition Challenging Enhancement of GCET Weightage in Professional Admissions. Petitioners Contend Sudden Change and Misapplication of Supreme Court Judgments.

27 Jun 2005

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a Government of Goa circular dated 4th April 2005 that assigned 100% weightage to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Unexplained Delay and Procedural Lapses. Legal Representatives' Failure to Seek Leave to Appeal and Filing a False Affidavit Precluded Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

5 Nov 2025

The case arose from the acquisition of land belonging to H.D. Lokeshaiah in Halanuru village, Tumakuru Taluk, for the construction of the Hemavathi Ca...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

8 Jan 2016

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Specific Performance Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court upholds its earlier judgment reversing High Court's partial decree for specific performance, holding that the petitioner failed to prove readiness and willingness and that the suit was barred by limitation.

18 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 o...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)