Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical Reproduction of Police Report Without Independent Satisfaction by District Magistrate.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Anant Manikrao Kachale, an agriculturist from Vaitagwadi, Parbhani, challenged his preventive detention order dated 24-08-2017 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Detention Challenge to COFEPOSA Order Filed by Wife of Proposed Detenu. Court holds that a pre-detention petition is not maintainable as the detention order had not been served and the detenu was not in custody.

24 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Smt. Shanta Prakash Shewale, wife of Prakash Pandurang Shewale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a detention...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mushtaq Abubakar Sayed, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Specification of Period — Blanket Order Invalid Under Section 3(2) Proviso. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 mandates specification of detention period in the order, and a blanket order without such specification is invalid.

23 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Shriram Jadhav, challenged the legality and correctness of a detention order dated 18.9.2020 passed by the Collector and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Detenu in Slumlord Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether ordinary law was sufficient to prevent alleged dangerous activities.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Tirupati @ Atharva Jivanrao Mundkar, challenged the detention order dated 25th May 2023 passed by the Commission...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-supply of Translated Documents. Detention Order Held Violative of Article 22(5) as Kannada Translations of Relied-upon Court Order Sheets Were Not Furnished, Precluding Effective Representation.

8 Mar 2019

The case arose from a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Jayamma, the mother of detenu Ravikumar @ Kumara @ Tango, challenging a preventive detentio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider relevant material and that delay in considering representation violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

26 Jun 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa, wife of the detenue Bharath Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, und...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)