Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born After Cut-off Date — Government Resolution Cannot Apply Retrospectively to Employees in Service Before 2001. The court held that the bar on compassionate appointment for having a third child after 31/12/2001 cannot be applied to employees who were already in service before the Government Resolution dated 28/03/2001 came into force.

1 Jul 2024

The petitioner, whose father Hiralal was an Assistant Teacher in Panchayat Samiti, Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, died in service on 14/03/2009. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Notice of No-Confidence Cannot Be Withdrawn Once Given; Bar of Two Years Applies to Moving of Motion, Not Notice.

12 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Vijay Ramdas Kokate, was the Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat. On 8th February 2022, a notice of no-confidence was given to the Tahsildar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch to Vote in UpaSarpanch Election - Collector's Refusal Set Aside. Sarpanch is a member of Gram Panchayat and entitled to vote in election of UpaSarpanch under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kalpana Bapurao Thakare, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Nandgaon Chincholi. Elections for the post of UpaSarpanch were sche...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contract with Gram Panchayat. Joint Ownership of Hotel Property with License from Panchayat Constitutes Interest in Contract Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

27 Jan 2017

The Petitioner, Jijabai Tukaram Gaikwad, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Takave (Budruk) in 2015. The Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch — Procedural Irregularities Not Sufficient to Invalidate Motion Passed by Majority. The court held that the no-confidence motion passed by a majority of 9 out of 13 members was valid under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not vitiate the motion.

22 Nov 2016

The petitioners, 13 ex-members of the Grampanchayat of Rukadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch Due to Lack of Quorum in Gram Sabha Meeting. Section 14 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Requires Quorum of One-Tenth of Total Voters for Valid Election.

2 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Balaji Savalkar, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election of respondent No. 4, Vikas Dongare, as Sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court Holds That Removal of Sarpanch by No Confidence Motion Does Not Require Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 55(2A) of the Act.

11 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Bharat Vitthal Shete, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Pimpalgaon Khand. A no confidence motion was moved against him by respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Payment of Tax Before Scrutiny Cures Disqualification. The court held that Section 16(1)(j) disqualification for non-payment of tax does not apply if the candidate pays the tax before the last date for filing nominations, as the provision must be read harmoniously with the scheme of the Act.

28 Jan 2011

The judgment involves five writ petitions filed by candidates who were declared elected as Sarpanch of various Gram Panchayats in Dhule district. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)