Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tax Notification Excluding Lead Sub-Oxide from Industrial Input List. Lead Sub-Oxide Held to Be an Industrial Input Under Entry 67 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, Entitled to Reduced Tax Rate.

The petitioner, M/s A.P.S. Industries, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of Lead Sub Oxide (Lead Oxide Grey), challenged a notifi...