Search Results for "Joint Compromise"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Joint Compromise"

427 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 427 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal as Settled Out of Court Following Mediation — Parties Enter Joint Memorandum of Compromise and Addendum, Appeal Dismissed as Settled.

13 Feb 2026

The appeal was filed by M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd against M/s. Delkon (India) Pvt Ltd and the Sole Arbitrator, challenging an order dated 22.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Dispute over ancestral property and limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 — Held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the appellant's possession was not adverse.

8 Sep 2025

The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants, Mahadeo Sitaram Navale and Chaturabai Maha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Conviction Restored for One Cheque, Acquittal Set Aside for Another. The court upheld the conviction of the accused in one case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and set aside the acquittal in another case, holding that the presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted in the first case, while in the second case the debt was time-barred and not legally enforceable.

22 Mar 2025

The judgment involves two connected matters: Criminal Revision Petition No.400/2016 and Criminal Revision Petition No.401/2016 filed by Sri D. Vijay (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition Among Muslim Heirs. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Petitioners Entitled to Joint Possession as Co-Sharers Under Muslim Personal Law.

5 Jul 2023

The petitioners, legal representatives of Syed Mohiuddin Ali @ Modin Ali, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry made in the revenue rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Compromise Between Husband and Wife. Matrimonial Dispute Settled, Continuation of Criminal Proceedings Held to Be Abuse of Process of Court Under Section 482 CrPC.

3 Oct 2022

The applicants, who are the husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law of respondent no. 2 (the informant), filed a criminal application under Section 4...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Review Petition — Delay of 89 Days Not Sufficiently Explained, Limitation Period for Review Not Extended by Supreme Court's Liberty. The court held that pursuing a Special Leave Petition does not constitute sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the liberty granted by the Supreme Court does not extend the limitation period for filing a review.

25 Apr 2019

The applicants, who were not parties to the original suit, had filed a Second Appeal (No. 21/2018) which was dismissed as not maintainable by the Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Amend Written Statement Based on Foreign Divorce Decree and Permits Withdrawal of Consent to Mutual Divorce. The Court held that amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC is necessary for just adjudication and that consent under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act can be withdrawn unilaterally before decree.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioner-husband, Vishal Nitinkumar Kondhia, and the respondent-wife, Jahnvi Vishal Kondhia, were parties to matrimonial proceedings before the ...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)