Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

394 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 394 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees of National Textile Corporation Ltd. — Petitioners Not Employees of NTC Ltd. as They Were Appointed by Contractors and No Employer-Employee Relationship Established.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shilpa S. Chandankar and Priyanka Pradeep Chavan against the National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Order Holding Termination of Trainees as Unfair Labour Practice. Trainees performing regular work for over 240 days deemed permanent workmen under Model Standing Orders, termination without Section 25F compliance illegal.

The petitioners, M/s Mukand Limited and others, challenged an order of the Labour Court at Thane and the revisional order of the Industrial Court at T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Status of Voluntary Health Workers as Workmen Entitled to Permanency. Municipal Corporation's Scheme of Voluntary Health Workers does not create a master-servant relationship, but workers are entitled to permanency under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of petitions concerns Voluntary Health Workers appointed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, particularly in relation to their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Seeking Reinstatement Beyond Age 60 — Employee Not Covered Under BIR Act as He Was Not an 'Employee' Under Section 3(13).

The appellant, Shri Vithal Bakula Kokate, was initially appointed as a Learner by Podar Mills in 1966 and later promoted to various positions, ultimat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Petitioner Failed to Prove Employee-Employer Relationship with Respondent Company.

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhalchandra Chavre, filed a complaint under Section 28(1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employee Terminated Without Notice in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an award of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer Failed to Prove Continuous Service of 240 Days Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, M/s. States People Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed four writ petitions challenging separate awa...