Search Results for "Illegal Gratification"

379 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 379 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Permanent Pension Cut for Corruption in Co-operative Department — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Rejoining Duty Proved. Disciplinary Authority's Decision Based on Enquiry Report and TNPSC Opinion Not Interfered With Under Article 226.

The petitioner, S. Ponmani, while serving as Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, was issued a charge memo on 05.05.2005 alleging that he d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Pension Cut for Corruption in Co-operative Department. Disciplinary Proceedings for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Upheld as Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

The petitioner, S. Ponmani, while serving as Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, was issued a charge memo on 05.05.2005 alleging that he d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap failed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Special Case No.2/88, acquitting the respondent-ac...