Search Results for "Dishonoured cheques"

498 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 498 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Appellate Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence on Limitation. Matter Remanded to NCLAT for Fresh Consideration of Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963 in Context of Section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Application.

The dispute arose from an operational creditor's application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against a corporate debtor fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted Only by Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Mere Denial.

The appellant, Sau. Dwaribai Nanakram Jivatramani, proprietor of Rajesh Agarbatti, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...