Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Appeal Against Refund Order in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Bank Not Obliged to Refund 25% Deposit When Auction Purchaser Defaults on Balance Payment.

The appellant, Canara Bank, conducted an e-auction on 29 November 2021 of a property under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of 1259 Days Delay in Filing Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Repeated Assurances by Accused Constitute Sufficient Cause for Delay.

The petitioner, Hiren Ashwin Shah, challenged the order dated 20 December 2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali, Mumbai, which affirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of Process Issued Under Section 138 NI Act Against Directors Due to Insolvency Moratorium and Insufficient Averments. Complaint Did Not Specify Role of Each Director and Cheques Were Presented After Moratorium Order Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Background: Two criminal applications under Section 482 CrPC were filed by nine directors of M/s. Amtek Auto Ltd. seeking quashing of process orders i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute Over Withheld Payments. Court upholds award directing release of Rs. 2,66,48,000 with 8% interest, finding no patent illegality or perversity under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 2 March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...