Search Results for "12(3) settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "12(3) settlement"

179 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 179 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 9-Year Delay in Recall Application in Suit Withdrawal Case — Unconditional Withdrawal Under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC is Plaintiff's Absolute Right. The court held that the plaintiff's right to unconditionally withdraw a suit is absolute and cannot be fettered by the court, and a delay of over 9 years in seeking recall of such an order cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Engineers and Developers Private Limited, had filed a suit (RCS No. 782 of 2012) against the respondents seeking declar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking LL.B. Course Duration Reduction and Fee Refund. Court holds that academic policy decisions are within the domain of expert bodies and not subject to judicial review under Article 226.

15 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Forum For Fast Justice and its founder chairman, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

10 May 2023

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.

22 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.

2 Apr 2019

The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against NGT Orders in Sterlite Copper Plant Closure Case — Upholds Maintainability of Composite Appeal Under NGT Act. The Court held that a composite appeal under Section 16 of the NGT Act is maintainable and that closure orders without natural justice are invalid.

18 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) concerning the closure of a copper smelter p...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)