Search Results for "workmen representation"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Quashing of Recovery Notice. Employer Cannot Recover Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Its Own Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Examination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Benefits Under Government Resolution 17.10.1988 -- Petitioner Claim for Regularization and Back Wages Rejected Due to Non-Compliance with Conditions

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking benefits under Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India's Restructuring and Transfer of Employees to Subsidiaries. Transfer of employees to wholly owned subsidiaries held not to be closure or retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by various trade unions and associations of employees of Air India Limited challenging...