Search Results for "trade parlance"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Held Not Agricultural Despite Plantation. Sale of Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels at High Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, husband and wife, who sold their ancestral prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Not Agricultural Land. Land adjacent to five-star hotels with high sale price and lack of systematic cultivation fails to qualify as agricultural land under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, Minguel Chandra Pais and Maria Leila Tovar Furt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold by Non-Resident Indians Held Not Agricultural Land. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with Barren Nature and High Sale Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Non-Agricultural. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with High Sale Price and Lack of Systematic Cultivation Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had upheld the C...